Ethnos and Demos.
For a Genealogy of Populism
During the last decades «populism» has become a sort of catchword both
in the political and scholarly debate. Given that global transformations are
calling into question the fundamentals of modern politics, the concepts
of «ethnos» and «demos» can be considered a privileged point of view
that can be analytically used to grasp the currently dominant view
among historians and sociologists that nationalism has to be seen as a
uniquely modern phenomenon established by industrialization and mass
communication in the nineteenth century. The article also discusses the
view of those who criticize and reject the exclusive identification of the
nation with modernity. Nations emerged at a certain point in history.
They form and disappear, and are therefore not «primordial» in this sense.
Furthermore, the national phenomenon has evolved in history, so even the
term «perennial» is insufficiently reflective of historical change. Another
important question raised by the nationalism-debate has to deal with the
role of religion in political life (particularly, the modern Reformation and
the sacralization of nation in the post-revolutionary era). The ultimate
aim of this analytical review is to propose a sort of general framework to
interpret the transformations of political collective identities in the longterm
perspective of Nation-building and in the context of a global society.