Impossible but Real, Real but Impossible.
The Question of Representation of Civic Interest Groups
According to several scholars the idea of a representative role of
citizens’ organizations is a contradiction: since representation is by
definition making present someone that is absent, when civil society get
organized and act in the public arena there is no need for representation.
This argument, however, is put under question by several empirical
evidences: self-organized citizens that act in the public arena exert the
roles of «standing for» and «acting for», which are the hard core of
the concept of representation. Moreover, this role is widely recognized
by public and private interlocutors of active citizenship organizations.
On the other side, the matter that this representative role is practiced
and recognized does not avoid short circuits and paradoxes that
seem impossible to overcome in the framework of the representation
Standard View. Adopting as point of reference the recent literature
on «non-electoral» and «informal» forms of representation and in
particular, the redefinition of the issue set up by Dario Castiglione
and Mark Warren, the author proposes a thematization that could
give reason for this contradiction and offer suggestions on the way to
address it.