From ǧihād to diwān in two providential histories of Hispania/al-Andalus
This paper examines two of the earliest histories of the conquest, one
written in Latin and the other in Arabic, which offer variant perspectives.
The author of the so-called Mozarabic Chronicle of 754 was writing for an
audience who remembered the second wave of Muslim settlement in the
740s. The chronicler’s viewpoint is Christian, but it is not parochial, and
locates his history of Hispania within the wider Mediterranean world. The
brief account of the conquest in Ibn Ḥabīb’s universal History, written a
century later, looks less promising, being mainly a collection of stories
about the Table of Solomon and other wonders that the conquerors are said
to have found in al-Andalus. Yet Ibn Ḥabīb was also a legal scholar who
left judgements on ǧihād that help us to understand his perspective on the
transition to Islamic rule.